Hello Tomcat,
First off, my hats to & thanks to you for executing this major review from my one-liner question
On your point of varied magnification, I read that many manufacturers depart from their stated focal length, and in the case of smaller sensored manufacturers, small variances lead to noticeable FOV differences. Thanks for highlighting this.
From your review of centre performance, it's quite amazing to note how well the Leica zoom kept up with the
ZD prime at equivalent FLs although in fairness the latter design has to accomodate the faster F2 optical requirement. It's not until F16 where diffraction effect set in that quality is on par, else the Leica appears to have a descernible edge in edge contrast, and indirectly resolution.
On your separate post on edge performance, it is interesting to note that the
ZD exhibitions strong colours at F2 which starts to lose intensity towards smaller apertures while the Leica which never reaches the ZDs intensity at F2, appears stronger than the
ZD at other equivalent F stops.
BTW: It was really wonderful to see you include test at F2 as the optical improvements gained moving from F2 to F3.5 was very noticeable.
Lastly, can I have your permission to put this in Mytikas' knowledge base, it is our privilege to have this post captured this wonderful post & contribution. Feel free to finalize & add further comments as you deem fit.
Final comments, a truly competitive lens the Leica is, too bad it comes with a body attached :-)
Also possible variation of test, Leica lens &
ZD performing with Olympus TruePic turbo & Studio, plus ZD35mm Macro alongside the Leica. Tests like these are tedious, let us know how we can be of help :-)
Thanks Again !